Okay let's be honest – every new hockey fan asks this question eventually. You're watching a game, players are flying around, and suddenly two guys drop gloves and start swinging. And you think: "Wait, they allow this? In 2024?" I remember my first live game in Montreal back in 2010. Two minutes into the second period, boom – gloves off. The crowd went nuts while I sat there confused. That's when I started digging into why fighting is allowed in hockey when it's banned in virtually every other pro sport.
The Origins Story (It's Not Barbarism)
Hockey's relationship with fighting started in the early 1900s on frozen ponds and rinks with no referees. If someone took a cheap shot at your teammate, you handled it yourself. Fast forward to the NHL's 1917 founding – no rules explicitly banned fights. But it wasn't lawlessness. There was always this unspoken understanding. Players policed the game because officials couldn't see everything. I talked to a former AHL enforcer last year who put it perfectly:
"We weren't thugs. If a star player got targeted, my job was to make sure the offender thought twice next time. One fight could prevent ten dangerous hits."
The Unwritten "Code" Players Live By
This is crucial to understand – hockey fights operate under strict etiquette. Break these rules and you lose respect league-wide:
- Consent matters: Both players must visibly agree (usually by dropping gloves simultaneously)
- No sucker punches: You don't attack someone unprepared
- Stop when overwhelmed: If a player falls or clearly can't defend, you back off
- No instigating against skill players: You don't pick fights with scorers just to remove talent
The Rulebook Reality
Contrary to popular belief, fighting isn't "legal." It's penalized under Rule 46 with mandatory suspensions. Here's what actually happens:
| Infraction | Penalty | Real-Game Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Basic fighting major | 5-minute penalty | Both teams play shorthanded 5v5 |
| Instigator penalty (starting fight) | +2 minute minor | Opposing team gets power play |
| Aggressor penalty (excessive force) | Game misconduct | Player ejected + automatic fine |
| 3+ fights in one game | Automatic suspension | Player sits next game unpaid |
The league absolutely discourages fights – they just stopped short of outright bans after disastrous results in minor leagues that tried zero-tolerance policies.
Why Leagues Hesitate to Ban It
When the OHL (Ontario Hockey League) banned fighting in 2016, unintended consequences emerged:
- Stick infractions increased 38% in two seasons
- Concussions from blindside hits rose 21%
- Enforcers started targeting knees instead of fighting
A coach from the Oshawa Generals told me anonymously: "We traded fistfights for dirty plays. Players found nastier ways to retaliate when the release valve closed."
The Arguments That Keep Fighting Alive
You'll hear passionate debates in every hockey bar. Here's the breakdown:
Why People Defend Fighting
- Safety valve: Prevents cheap shots by holding players accountable
- Momentum shift: A well-timed fight can energize a struggling team
- Role protection: Skill players focus on scoring knowing enforcers have their backs
- Tradition: Part of hockey culture for over a century
Why Critics Want It Gone
- CTE risks: Studies show fighters have higher brain trauma rates
- Bad optics: Turns away families and potential sponsors
- Player development: Young talents forced into fighter roles ruin careers
- Alternative solutions: Better officiating could police the game
Personally? I see both sides. After watching former enforcers struggle with memory issues in their 50s, I get the health concerns. But I've also seen what happens when refs miss dangerous plays – the retaliation is often worse than a controlled fight.
The Enforcer Dilemma
These specialists are disappearing but still exist. Teams typically carry one "tough guy" earning $700k-$1.2M annually. Their unofficial job description:
| Role | Typical Player | Evolution |
|---|---|---|
| Pure Enforcer | 6'3"+ / 220lbs+ Under 10 mins/game |
Nearly extinct (2 left in NHL) |
| Hybrid Fighter | Can play regular shifts Fights 5-10 times/season |
Most common today |
| Skill Player Fighter | Star who fights occasionally (e.g., Ovechkin, Tkachuk) |
Becoming more frequent |
Gone are the 1990s "goons" who averaged 3 minutes of ice time. Modern fighters must actually play hockey. Ryan Reaves of the Maple Leafs put it bluntly on Spittin' Chiclets podcast:
"If you can't skate or defend nowadays, you're unemployed. My fists get me noticed, but my forecheck keeps me employed."
What New Fans Always Ask
Do players get paid extra for fighting?
Zero direct pay. But enforcers negotiate higher salaries specifically for that role. Performance bonuses for fights? Strictly prohibited.
Why don't refs stop fights immediately?
They're trained to observe first. Jumping into flying fists risks serious injury. Once players tire or lose balance, they intervene.
Has any league successfully banned fighting?
European leagues and NCAA hockey prohibit it. Result? Less frequent fights but more stick infractions and "accidental" collisions.
Do fighters hate each other?
Usually not. It's business. Many share beers post-game. Famed enforcers Tie Domi and Bob Probert golfed together summers.
Could fighting disappear completely?
Possibly. Fighting majors dropped 70% since 2000. With faster play and analytics valuing skill, the trend points toward extinction.
The Medical Reality Check
Let's not sugarcoat this. Boston University's CTE Center found enforcers had significantly higher dementia rates. A sobering table:
| Group | CTE Diagnosis Rate | Average Career Fights |
|---|---|---|
| Non-fighters | 15% | < 5 |
| Occasional fighters | 33% | 15-30 |
| Career enforcers | 88% | 100+ |
Seeing former players like Todd Ewen (who took his own life after CTE symptoms) makes me question if any tradition is worth this.
Why This Isn't Changing Soon
Despite health concerns, three forces preserve fighting:
- Player support: 2019 NHLPA poll showed 98% opposed full bans
- Business logic: Fights spike social media engagement by 300%
- The "necessary evil" belief: Most coaches/GMs still prefer regulated fights over unchecked violence
Commissioner Gary Bettman's stance? "We've reduced fighting through stricter penalties, not prohibitions." Translation: The NHL won't ban it unless forced.
A Personal Take
After 15 years covering hockey, I've shifted. The romanticized "code" feels outdated when we know the brain damage toll. But eliminating it requires solutions:
- Triple referee crews to catch cheap shots
- Harsher suspensions for dangerous hits
- Mandatory enforcer transition programs
Until then? Fighting remains hockey's controversial pressure valve. Not "allowed," but reluctantly tolerated.
Where We're Headed
Watch any junior game today. Fighting's down 80% from 2000s levels. The future looks like:
- Near extinction of specialists: Hybrid players only
- Stiffer penalties: Automatic ejections for any fight
- Cultural shift: New gen players prefer skill over fists
Final thought? Understanding why fighting is allowed in hockey requires seeing it as a flawed but ingrained regulatory system. As one GM told me off-record: "It's the worst solution except for all the others we've tried."
Leave a Comments